site security

[chow]

If as Chow says that information on this site could put Keith in "Danger" (i assume that is what he is saying) this thread should be put to bed and done through another (more secure ) medium. His safety has to be the first priority.
__________________
can we have a poll as to how members feel,peoples safety must, as gwyn states be a priority..i personally, firmly believe that our site is safe.

[jefford0314]

I agree with you as I to think that this site is safe.

[Rog Ball 01]

I agree the site is safe, however, peeps must be careful in what they are saying and what they mention re members/locatoions etc.

[nasher546]

Hello Chow,

I think the site is safe. Would'nt be on it otherwise. Have to agree with Rog, we sometimes have to be careful in mentioning members exact locations etc.

[Gwyn Nicholas]

If as Chow says that information on this site could put Keith in "Danger" (i assume that is what he is saying) this thread should be put to bed and done through another (more secure ) medium. His safety has to be the first priority.
__________________
can we have a poll as to how members feel,peoples safety must, as gwyn states be a priority..i personally, firmly believe that our site is safe.

Just to clarify gents. When I used the term "this site" I was actually refering to the NIVA in the "third party" I did not mean the Forum. My point was that the NIVA site inferred that information regarding Keith may put him in danger according to chows post. That without further information set the alarm bells ringing. For me at any rate.
I also am quite happy with the security of this site. Apologies for any misunderstanding.

[Rog Ball 01]

No probs Gwyn, at least it has brought out points about what is said, by whom and where they are from.

People tend to forget the above when chatting, sending texts or creating threads on any site on the web.