Re: George Surmon Jenkins
I can confirm there is a Pte George Jenkins on the medal roll for the Ashantee campaign of 1874 with 2/RWF. He was awarded the medal without the Coomassie clasp.
His Regimental number is 2090, which should unlock some more doors for you. Have you had anyone search for his papers at the National Archive?
I will do some more digging for you, but you are correct that the RWF did not serve in the Zulu Campaign.
Richard
Re: George Surmon Jenkins
Hey that was quick Richard! Am I correct in thinking that if he was enlisted with another regiment for the Anglo-Zulu War that he would have a second and different regimental number?
I have poked around the PRO website myself but I have to admit that I find it difficult to navigate their search engine. I'll see what I can turn up with the regimental number you have provided. What is the significance of the lack of Coomassie Clasp?
BTW, I was in Kumasi myself in 1971 on a visit to Ghana to see my future wife who was working in the upper Volta region at a little place called Jasikan. Of course at that time I had no idea that my great grandfather had been to Ghana almost 100 years before me!
Thanks, :biggrin:
Ross
Re: George Surmon Jenkins
Hi Ross
Again your right, if he transferred to another regiment he would have been given a new number. The trick will really be to see if his W097's have survived (Service Papers) If these have been destroyed, then it should be possible to track him through the muster rolls. Hopefully it might put us on to the trail of another regiment. Quite a few served in the Zulu campaign, so clues badly needed. Also remember, it could also have been an old soldiers tale.
Most of the things you need to check are not available online I am sorry to say. I hardly get there anymore due to work and children, but can highly recommend a researcher who can do it for you. He does mine for me, and has never disappointed.
The lack of the Coomassie clasp means that George did not cross north of the Prah river, and so was not present at Amoaful and the capture of the capital.
What a coincidence about being in the region, as it is not a popular holiday destination. I suspect that the region had changed somewhat in the 100 years!
I'm off to do some real work now, although I would rather be having a dig around for you! Will see what else we can find when I get home and the kids are in bed.
Richard
Re: George Surmon Jenkins
Thanks Richard, I would appreciate the coordinates of your researcher. I wonder if my GGF would have enlisted with that other Welsh regiment, the 24th (South Wales Borderers)?
Just out of curiosity, I found a image on-line of Lt. Chards hand written copy of the muster roll for Rorkes Drift and not surprisingly there were two Private Jenkins listed, both with the 1/24th. One was killed so he can be ruled out but Private Jenkins 1083 survived. Not likely my GGF though. If he had been at Rorkes Drift I'm sure that much more would have been made of it in his obituaries etc. In any case, here is the URL to the Rorkes Drift muster roll:
http://www.soldiersofthequeen.com/images/ChardsRoll.jpg
I think the odds are about 50-50 that claims of his participation in the Zulu War are just an old soldiers tale.
Ross
Re: George Surmon Jenkins
Hello rawj1,
If you believe your relative served at either Isandlawana or Rorkes Drift he would have been in the Royal Warwickshire Regiment.the first battalion were wiped out at Isandlawana, and a detachment of "B" Company of the 2nd Warwicks defended the drift against Prince Dabulamanzi's Impi regiment.On an army reform of infantry regiments carried out in 1881 by Childers and later Caldwell there were 2 regiments of foot numbered the 24th.
These were the Warwicks and the South Wales Borderers. The Warwicks were originally known as Colonel Derings Regiment as he was charged with raising this regiment. Colonel Dering was born in Kent, and the Depot in Brecon was named after him.it was highly unlikely that any of the defenders of Rorkes Drift or Isandlwama ever saw the skies over Brecon.Childers and Caldwell also had as part of their remit to stop officers buying commissions up to the rank of major, the other part of their task was to stop flogging in the army. the Duke of Wellesly( General Wellington) and the Duke of Cambridge were both in favour of retaining flogging for disciplinary purposes. As a result of Childers and Caldwells efforts the South Wales Borderers were given the regimental number and style the 24th of Foot South Wales Borderers in 1881 some 3 years after the defence of the drift, and kept it until 1969 when they were amalgamated with the Welch Regiment to become the 24/41st of foot. the top army brass had their way regarding flogging, in as much as Field punishment was kept on during the Great War. Richard is quite correct in his statement that a lot of Regiments were involved in the South African wars.I am not listing them as it would take too long and I am goling from memory in this e mail.
Regards RBD aka jungle
Re: George Surmon Jenkins
Hello rawj1,
I am adding an after thought for you.There were two Chard reports from the drift.Bromhead also wrote a report and letters to Colonel Glyn about the defence of the drift.Colonel Glyn also wrote a report on the drift.Surgeon Reynolds wrote a report on the defence of the drift.there also exists a report from C/Sjt Bourne this differs from other reports in as much as Bourne claims that "B" Company were fired upon from the high ground at the drift.when the general concensus of opinion is that Prince Dabulamanzi left the drift against King Cetewayo's orders, to try and make a name for himself.the general belief is that Prince Dabulamanzi's 4,000 or so Impis moved out too fast to take ordinance from the fallen at Isandlawana. his report is therefore at odds with a lot of authors works on this battle.some doubt exists over these reports from Chard it is believed they were written by another unknown hand for Chard.
Regards RBDF aka jungle
Re: George Surmon Jenkins
Hi jungle1810,
Thanks for your background information. I have some doubts about my GGF participation in the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879. I guess he could have gone from farm labourer in April of 1878 to soldier again in time for the 1879 campaign and then somehow be out of the service in time to be found living with his in-laws in Birmingham by April 3, 1881 (the date of the 1881 UK census).
What sort of terms of enlistment would allow for such a short re-enlistment period? I suppose he might have been invalided out due to illness. Also, his oldest child, a daughter Jane, was born August 11, 1879 which means he must have been in the UK in November or December of 1878 in order to impregnate his wife. Doesn't seem to leave much time for soldiering does it?
Ross
Re: George Surmon Jenkins
Hi Ross
I have been digging but can find no further references to your chap. Next port of call for me would be a trawl of the National Archives.
Kevin Asplin is the the chap who does my digging for me these days, his email address is as below :
KevinAsplin@aol.com
If you tell him what you do know and what you think you know (ie the Zulu War part in the obit) He will give it his best shot. Just remember there is the chance that no papers have survived, but you will still need to pay for his time in looking, but if Kevin can't find them I doubt anyone can.
I had one chap I was researching by the name of Whitaker, who coincidently also served in the Ashantee war, who I could find no trace of at all. I conceded defeat and assumed the records were lost or destroyed. I accidentally including his name on a 'to-do' list to Kevin, and ended up with some papers to a chap called Goodwin ...... it seemed Whittaker had enlisted under an Alias and later came clean about it, and so his papers were filed under his correct name, which was not the one on the medal!
Please let us know how you get on. This is a very interesting thread.
Regards
Richard
Re: George Surmon Jenkins
Hi Richard,
Just a quick update. I've asked Kevin to see what he can find re: George Jenkins. He now has all the information that I have and he thinks that it will be pretty straight forward to research.
He mentioned that one possibility is that George went into the Army Reserve in 1878 and was recalled at start of the Zulu War. He said a lot of men from the 23rd were transferred to the 24th to help rebuild it after its near destruction at Isandalwana. I guess we will have to see what he finds before we know for sure.
Ross