bennyball2
11-04-2008, 14:03
Sending British soldiers on patrol or into battle with defective equipment could breach their human rights, a High Court judge has ruled.
Reference the above what are people's feelings on this, hasn’t this always been the case where army kit is concerned, I remember before the tour of the Falklands we had to buy quite a bit of basic kit like Gloves and gaiters, we certainly weren’t issued with Gortex jackets or the likes, but we just got on with it. On a tour of Northern Ireland when we were issued with the SA 80 I can remember the thing falling to pieces when out on patrol, also how long did it take the army to replace the 432 APC which wasn’t fit for the function it was required to do for years, but there again I always had a bottle of vodka and a red flag with me just in case.
Reference the above what are people's feelings on this, hasn’t this always been the case where army kit is concerned, I remember before the tour of the Falklands we had to buy quite a bit of basic kit like Gloves and gaiters, we certainly weren’t issued with Gortex jackets or the likes, but we just got on with it. On a tour of Northern Ireland when we were issued with the SA 80 I can remember the thing falling to pieces when out on patrol, also how long did it take the army to replace the 432 APC which wasn’t fit for the function it was required to do for years, but there again I always had a bottle of vodka and a red flag with me just in case.